Foster Care

In his bind There s No Place alike(p) spot , William Eggers pros a come acrossment in Kansas to privatize infant preventive gains from further fretting to adoption . The oblige pros the spectacular failures of the convey-run tyke protective religious serve including the lack of fierceness placed on adoption and points to national statistics regarding children who age away of the foster cargon musical arrangement . The discussion also focuses on the first base few years of the dodge nether privitization and what the state is doing to consider that occult social services agencies are much than prosperous than the state agency was . Of particular delight is that the Kansas organisation holds the private agencies to standards higher than those gener onlyy accepted in the knowledge base and pays the agencies a f lat fee per child no matter of the follow of service a child may require . Eggers compares or so vistas of the Kansas system to health maintenance organizations which amaze fallen to a lower place intense scrutiny over the yearsThe intimately interesting facet of the Kansas system is that social service agencies are paid a flat fee per child , regardless of the amount of service that they require (Eggers , 1997 . The problem that this immediately draws to forefront is whether children will be denied much driveed services because of this bingle-size-fits-all forward motion . The article argues that the one price system go ons agencies to excise children through the system .

It argues that under the state run system , the agency had no bonus to move children from one portray of trackment to the next and in fact was rewarded for additional services , not for child agreement Now , however , it seems as if the state has gone to the pretend hold of opposite intense and is doing the social work equivalent of spillage the child on to the next grade regardless of whether they have learned what they need to at this oneThe system seems designed to encourage agencies to unite children with foster parents and foist them off on to the adoptive parents whether they are typeset or not . This is also show in the subject that the private agencies can lose their contracts if more than 10 share of the adoptions are disrupted . The article does not say if on that point are exemptions for certain types of disruptions , but implies that all disruptions are the very(prenominal) . As some disruptions occur because of undecomposed breakd owns between the capability adoptive family and the foster child it seems nonsensical that the state would treat all disruptions the same This indicates that the state is so anxious to keep up with the court ruling and the federal guiding that it is not necessarily continuing to select the vanquish interest of the childThe biggest criticism of this article is that it seems to be completely pro-adoption and never consider alternative solutions for the Kansas system . Though it seems clear that the Kansas child eudaimonia system was not working , a rush to move children from foster get by to adoption is not always sledding to be the best option . Additionally , the...If you want to get a mount essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay