Mill's belief that if a person isn't harming anyone other than themselves, the gov't shouldn't step in

        Mill believes that as long as a thought is non harming any iodine merely themselves, it is not chastise for the giving medication to whole tone in and do anything to stop them. He believes that it is a great injustice to not allow someone do something if they be not harming anyone else than it is to let them do it even if they be guaranteed to sink from it. Although Mill believes in this form of justice and regimen, there atomic number 18 concourse who do not agree with him. There are three main criticisms of Mills beliefs which he defends. The first criticism is that these citizens who do whatever they want are acting homogeneous children. The restrain criticism is that they are dragging down society as a whole. The third is that they serve and bad examples to everyone. Mill responds to these criticisms, keeping true to his main idea that we should not punish participation for behaving in ways that hurt no one notwithstanding them selves.         Mills views about justice are criticized by those thinking that these mountain who are doing things to hurt themselves, and no others, are acting exchangeable children. And, desire children, they need to be parented. However society is do up of adults and, as a whole, is thought of like an adult. The politics would be considered an adult as well.

However,in this situation the relationship amongst a parent and child is not right. The relationship mingled with the society and the government is that of two adults. In society one adult does not enounce another one what to do the way it would tell its c hild what to do. And therefore, the argumen! t that these people are acting like children and need to be parented by the government does not work. The society should be treated, If you want to take down a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay